WhatsApp, the mobile messaging service that last week inked an agreement to be acquired by Facebook for $19 billion, announced yesterday that it will offer voice service later this year. The app will initially be available for Apple and Android devices, with subsequent offerings tailored for Microsoft and Blackberry. WhatsApp currently has 465 million users who each pay 99 cents after the first year; unlike its soon-to-be-parent Facebook, WhatsApp does not rely on advertising or pepper its users with ads.
The promised voice offering reveals some of the attraction WhatsApp offered to suitors and, ultimately, Facebook. In a Wall Street Journal report, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg observed that many messaging apps generate between two and three dollars per user. Combined with Facebook’s one billion users, that fact tends to reveal the revenue potential for the Facebook/WhatsApp deal.
Sweetening the deal for Facebook is the fact that the bulk of price will be paid in Facebook stock, not cash; the deal keeps WhatsApp away from Microsoft (which owns Skype) and Google (which, according to some skeptics or paranoids, will one day have a hand in everything).
WhatsApp CEO Jan Koum will join the Facebook board when the deal closes. WhatsApp is expected to operate as an independent unit following the acquisition.
I tried assuring, or rather convincing, my daughter the other day that I really did not grow up in “the olden days.” Or, at least that the years in which I was her age weren’t so long ago (to me, at least).
This is probably the point at which regular readers will probably guess that I am about to take another mawkish turn down the avenue of, “Gee, look how things have changed,” when in reality I haven’t really been around long enough to notice much change at all – unless you count the difference between marveling at a Compaq “carry around” computer and having 6,000-x more memory on my smart phone as a “difference” (1983 Compaq: 128K RAM; my phone: 768MB RAM). So, I’ll offer a spoiler alert – I am not going to get all sentimental on you, or even reference a Tandy computer using cassette tapes for memory. Rather, I am going to mention Facebook’s acquisition of WhatsApp and then offer a link to a delightful article from motherboard.vice.com that explores a series of services we just don’t get anymore. Read more
This week, Facebook released a new app that may or may not change the face of communications (no pun intended): it enables you to make voice calls from your desktop or smartphone.
No, it’s not a video call. It’s a “free” voice call.
Which means, really, that Facebook can now be “Voicebook.”
Just like a telephone.
I recognize that there is some merit in being able to glide somewhat seamlessly between a Facebook chat or poke and a voice call, and I recognize, as well, that universe of apps includes galaxies of really useful ones (I have one that measures the pitch of whatever you set the tablet on) and not-so-useful ones (but who am I to criticize; someone, somewhere, needs an app for that). And, this article from the New York Times notes the target market of teens who might find this more convenient (lazy?) than actually dialing numbers (even speed dialing) to speak with their friends. Read more
Broadcasting and Cable and TR Daily each published articles on June 18 highlighting efforts by Consumers Union, the Center for Digital Democracy and other consumer and children’s health advocacy organizations urging Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook to adopt strong privacy and child safety/parental control safeguard settings into Facebook. Read more
Sometime last year, probably in Wisconsin Rapids, I locked myself out of Facebook. My best reconstructive guess is that the hotel’s unfamiliar IP address prompted a series of security questions, which I failed, and which ultimately locked my account. Yesterday, however (and on a lark), I recalled some of the obscure answers. I checked in, explained my absence, posted five pictures and left.
About a year ago, someone proposed that rural telecom advocacy could be advanced by admonishing policy-makers to imagine what it would be like to live without Facebook for 24 hours. Or, more specifically, what it would be like to live with teenagers who did not have access to Facebook for 24 hours. Well, I managed it for 14 months, and since I didn’t end up living in a cave without a haircut, my hunch is that there are more compelling and sophisticated reasons to affirm the commitment to nationwide broadband deployment. Read more