When I was in law school, there seemed to be a point during the time running up to exams where everything fell into place – it was moment at which the process of simply ingesting information transformed to actually understanding the theory and process. I experienced another such sense last week at NTCA’s IP Possibilities (IPP, but soon to be IP Vision) conference.
IPP is my favorite NTCA conference (no offense intended to PR & Marketing, Finance & Accounting, or even Legal Seminar, which I appreciate greatly). Whereas most of the meetings in which I participate focus on the political or regulatory aspects of telecom, IPP pulls together the people who design, develop and deploy networks. So, it is the meeting where one hundred people pack a room to learn more about the IPv4 to IPv6 transition or cyber-security. But, it was not the expo floor, or the keynotes, or the break-out sessions where things fell into place. Rather, it was the Uber to the airport.
Initially unable to find anyone to share a cab, I made a reservation with a popular airport shuttle service; the price was projected to be approximately half of what a cab would cost. Several hours before leaving, however, I bumped into Ken Pyle from Viodi, and we determined that our flights left close enough in time to each other that we could share a ride. I cancelled my shuttle, and when it was time to leave, Ken called for Uber.
Within several minutes we were informed that we would be picked up by a blue Lexus. The shuttle I intended to take was blue, too. And that is where the similarities ended. Read more
Today, my NTCA colleague (and fellow pop culture buff) Christian Hamaker alerted me to the fact that long-time television director Richard L. Bare had passed away on March 28 at the age of 101. Bare’s greatest accomplishment was directing 166 of the 170 episodes of “Green Acres,” a sitcom that ran on CBS from 1965 to 1971.
Rural America was extremely popular on 1960s television. A number of rural-based programs—including, in addition to “Green Acres,” “The Andy Griffith Show,” “The Beverly Hillbillies,” “Petticoat Junction,” “Mister Ed,” and “Hee Haw”—all enjoyed successful runs during that time. In fact, CBS aired so many rural programs that it was joked the network’s name actually stood for “the Country Broadcasting System.”
“Green Acres” centered on a married couple, Oliver Wendall Douglas and his wife, Lisa (portrayed by Eddie Arnold and Eva Gabor), who left their city life behind to live on a farm in the small rural town of Hooterville. These two fishes-out-of-water were forced to deal with Hooterville’s eccentric residents, including a pig named Arnold, who was treated as a human by the town’s denizens. (In a bit of Hollywood typecasting, Arnold was indeed portrayed by an actual pig, leading Mr. Bare to observe that “for a long time I was the best pig director in Hollywood. There was nobody who could direct a pig like I could.”)
The town’s phone service was provided by the Hooterville Telephone Company, which employed an operator named Sarah to manually connect calls by plugging wires into a switchboard—and who often listened in on the resulting call in order to catch up on the town’s latest gossip. Most Hootervillians didn’t have a phone in their home, and the only public telephone was located atop a pole, requiring those placing or receiving an important call to shimmy to the top and hold on for dear life as they talked. Read more
A recent Pew Research Center study finds that 91 percent of teens go online from a mobile device. The report divulges differences among varying demographics, but regardless of race or economic standing, one truth remains: mobile Internet access is planted squarely among today’s youth.
The results may be encouraging, or sobering. The prevalence of on-line activities should be attractive to service providers, device vendors and on-line advertisers. Potential employers, however, may be wondering how to deal with an emerging workforce in which 56 percent characterize their mobile online access as “several times a day” and 24 percent acknowledge they have their nose in a screen “almost constantly.” The numbers are not wholly surprising – only 12 percent of teens 13 to 17 say they do not have a mobile device.
The character of usage among the sexes is similarly consistent with common portrayals of social interaction in popular film or literature: 37 percent of teen girls use messaging apps such as WhatsApp, while only 29 percent of boys claim to use them. The image of the young lady dragging the Western Electric phone into her room, or at least as long the as cord will stretch, endures. On average, girls text 79 times a day, while boys text 56 times per day. Surprises, however, lurk in the report.
It should come as no shock that 84 percent of boys play games on-line or on their phones, a substantially higher amount than the 59 percent of girls who play video games. The, “what did you say,” however, emanates from the fact that 59 percent of girls are playing on-line games.
Facebook is virtually equally attractive to both boys and girls. Or, more specifically, equally very attractive to boys and girls, with 72 percent of boys using Facebook as compared to 70 percent of girls.
The study lays to rest any doubts (if there were any) that mobile device usage is cemented into teen life.
A conversation I have been hearing recently goes somewhat like this: “When can I get a phone?”
“When you take yourself to school by yourself.”
“So, high school?”
“Not necessarily – you’ll still be either on a bus or in a carpool then.”
That’s about where the conversation ends. Sometimes, the subject who wants the phone leaves the room. It is a scene repeated in several houses across my neighborhood.
Data is everywhere. The questions are, how is any set interpreted, and what does one do with the results?
Maybe the Pew research indicates that the social threshold for having one’s own mobile device has changed from something extravagant (or, at least not wholly necessary for school kids who are really never alone) to something little different than the graduation to one’s own set of house keys.
# # #
It may also indicate social trends that outline how parents approach their children’s independence.
Separately, but not wholly unrelatedly, if you follow local DC news, then chances are you know by now that the so-called “free range” children are back in the headlines. For those unfamiliar with the on-going saga, Maryland law provides that children under eight may not be left alone at home or in car. The law says nothing about “outside,” which is why a somewhat murky result arose when Montgomery County (Maryland) Child Protective Services intervened in the case of a family whose parents permitted their children, six and 10, to walk unaccompanied in downtown Silver Spring, Maryland. And, for those unfamiliar with “downtown Silver Spring,” it boasts a movie theater, a handful of office buildings, some shopping, and an old JC Penny that has been converted into a concert venue. It is “downtown,” but mostly only in comparison to the suburban streets that surround it.
The case has stirred predictable debate on parenting, government intervention and either actual changing social norms or perceived social norms. I remember how old I was when I went downtown or out and about by myself in the Midwest. One commenter to a news story remembered wandering the neighborhood at a young age before cell phones.I don’t remember how old I was when I was allowed to the take the bus to my Midwest downtown “by myself.” It was only about three miles away, and I am guessing it was probably fifth or sixth grade that I was headed there with a friend during school vacation days. If I remembered to take a quarter for a payphone, then it was evidence that I had thought ahead before venturing out.
And, so, in light of the Pew data, I wonder whether outcome with the Silver Spring children would have been different if they would have been able to produce a phone. Which might then beg the social question of, is the phone intended to enable the child to reach the parent – or the parent to reach the child?
Researchers at Manchester University have announced the impending release of the first commercially viable (more on that concept below) product using Graphene, a material dubbed a “wonder material” by the American Chemical Society. According to the BBC, the Graphene light bulb will be available on British store shelves within months. While it’s only about 10 percent more energy efficient than other light bulbs, the material itself is the key here.
Graphene (again, according to the American Chemical Society) is a carbon-based material (as are diamonds and coal). However, unlike the latter, Graphene is made up of carbon atoms that are arranged in two-dimensional sheets. This makes it incredibly strong. How strong? About 100 times stronger than steel. It also conducts electricity to the same extent as copper, can conduct heat as well as any other material, and is incredibly thin. Read more
Trying to explain what I do for a living is difficult, sometimes. In our bubble, talk of things like CPNI or DE credits is common; to the outside observer, however, our universe is peppered with incomprehensible acronyms that describe spheres of regulation the average person does not consider. Sometimes, however, a confluence of issues manifests in a single event to illustrate, understandably, what we do (or, more accurately, what RLECs do not do, since the described circumstances would not occur in an RLEC service territory).
This article from Consumerist describes the plight of a man who purchased a house with the understanding that he would be able to obtain broadband at the location. The cable company, after several site visits, declined to extend service; the incumbent telco described the location as being in “permanent exhaust,” meaning that no new customers would be added. The story embraces numerous issues – broadband mapping; competition; universal service; telework; muni broadband. There is not much I can add to the article, so use the link above and simply count this post as a “news aggregator”/”in case you missed it” feature. I do not agree with all of the editorial conclusions in the article, but it is worth a good read. And, no, it is not an April Fool’s post.
The AAA recently reported results of a study it conducted regarding distracted teen driving. Although many states recognize the confluence of inexperience and distraction and accordingly place limit on teen drivers (such as curfews or limits on the number of passengers they may carry), the AAA study reviewed 1,700 videos of teen drivers and found that 12 percent of accidents resulted from drivers using phones while driving (15 percent of accidents occurred as drivers were interacting with other passengers, and 10 percent occurred while drivers were looking elsewhere inside the vehicle). Of note is that all of the filmed drivers were aware that a camera had been placed inside the vehicle. Read more
For the first time ever, worldwide sales of smartphones topped one billion in 2014, according to IT research company Gartner, Inc.
The 1.2 billion units sold marked an increase of 28.4% from 2013. Smartphone sales now represent two-thirds of all mobile phone sales worldwide.
More than 367 million smartphones were sold in the 4th quarter of 2014 alone, representing nearly one-third of the annual total, up 29.9% from the 4th quarter of 2013. Also in the 4th quarter, Apple overtook Samsung to claim first place overall—a spot Samsung had held since 2012.
Driven largely by the release of its iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus, Apple sold nearly 75 million smartphones in the 4th quarter of 2014, representing a 20.4% market share. Samsung was second, at 73 million and 19.9% market share, followed by Lenovo (24.3 million, 6.6%), Huawei (21 million, 5.7%) and Xiaomi (18.6 million, 5.1%). Read more